Newsletter signup

* Email
* First Name
* Last Name
Post Code
 

Pig In Hell
A Report into the British Pig Industry
by Juliet Gellatley, BSc Zoology
Director of Viva!


Drugs

Intensive farms make an ideal breeding ground for bugs.

Antibiotics are used in farmed animals for three reasons: to promote growth, to treat disease (therapeutic use) and to prevent disease (prophylactic use.)

In-feed antibiotics tylosin phosphate, virginiamycin, zinc bacitracin and spiramycin were banned in the EU after June 1999, followed by carbadox and oliquindox (60). A total of 7 out of 11 antibiotic growth promoters have been banned in the EU.

However, spiramycin and tylosin phosphate continue to be used for disease prevention (not as growth promoters). Avalymycin continues to be used as a growth promoter, and may be causing resistant VRE (vancomycin resistant enterococci). Use of lincomycin (cross resistant with clindamycin) in pigs is increasing.

There are detailed reports on why antibiotic use in farmed animals is causing a threat to human health (61, 62, 63, 74, 65). Farm use of antibiotics have caused antibiotic resistance to medical drugs in 3 types of food poisoning (salmonella, campylobacter and E coli) and drugs of last resort for treating two strains of the hospital superbug, VRE, which infects wounds and incisions. (70)

Resistance in the food poisoning bacteria has come mainly from using antibiotics routinely to prevent disease. In the case of VRE, resistance has come from using growth promoting antibiotics in farmed animals.

In simple terms, antibiotics have been massively overused by farmers. This has led to bacteria becoming resistant to the drugs so that when the same drugs are used to treat humans, they no longer work.

Although 7 growth promoting antibiotics have been banned, 4 are still in use and others are used to treat and prevent disease. Writers for Pig Farming magazine are against the banning of antibiotics; they say that it will result in increased therapeutic use of drugs (which is true and a reason why factory farming itself has to end).

MAFF state that antibiotics are used more in indoor systems than outdoor (62). Pigs reared in indoor, intensive systems will receive drug treatment throughout their life until slaughter - usually at under 5 to 6 months old. In healthier pig herds antibiotic use may be restricted to injections and growth promoter use. However, in most conventional herds water and feed medication is also practiced.

Diseases and the drugs used

MAFF state (62) that:

Treatment may be given to sows for metritis, mastitis and for diseases such as erysipelas and leptospirosis. In most indoor herds antibiotic treatment starts soon after birth. Piglets will receive drugs for enteritis and for respiratory disease. From weaning (usually 3 weeks) all piglets are gathered, mixed and then reared to finishing weights. Weaners usually develop post weaning diarrhoea caused by E. coli which occurs on day 3 post weaning.

Post-weaning diarrhoea is quickly followed by a range of other diseases. Glassers Disease (haemophilus parasuis) occurs at 4 weeks, pleuropneumonia at 6-8 weeks, proliferative enteropathy from 6 weeks and spirochaetal diarrhoea and colitis at any time from 6 weeks onwards (MAFF 1998).

At 8 weeks the pigs are termed growers and moved to another house. Here they will develop enzootic pneumonia, streptococcal meningitis (Streptococcus suis) and, possibly, swine dysentery. Respiratory disease may cause problems until slaughter (MAFF, 1998).

Quite an indictment of factory farming!

Use of antibiotics varies from unit to unit. In a survey of pig farms in 1995, farms were found which used only penicillin and streptomycin and, perhaps, tetracycline for wounds. These herds were free of most of the diseases requiring treatment. Other herds were infected with a range of diseases and had been prescribed up to 10 antimicrobials (MAFF, 1998) (62).

In a typical herd there is use of neomycin, apramycin, amoxyclav, ampicillin, enrofloxacin or trimethroprim sulphonamide in the diarrhoeic piglets for E coli enteritis (MAFF, 1998).

From weaning pigs will receive feed medicated with a growth promoter. Avilamycin is commonly used. Copper at 175 ppm will be present in all rations. At weaning pigs will receive medication to treat the post weaning E. coli diarrhoea and any Oedema (swelling) disease which may be present.

In 50% of herds the feed is medicated with zinc oxide at 3000 ppm to prevent this and is usually given for two weeks in the feed (MAFF, 1998) (62).

From two weeks after weaning pig feed may contain antibiotics to treat infection with H parasuis, A pleuropneumoniae, S suis (causes meningitis), L intrecellularis. This feed usually contains a tetracycline and is often a combination of chloretetracycline, sulphadimidine and penicillin (MAFF, 1998). The MAFF review adds 'it is important to realise that although each pig may receive a treatment course of a week at most, medication on the farm is continuous, as new pigs inter that age group every week'.

MAFF say:

“Major problems with pig farms are the amount of antimicrobials used, the use of tylosin in the farm which results in the presence of Campylobacter resistant to tylosin at slaughter and the contribution made to antibiotic resistance”... (62)

In evidence to the House of Lords select committee, Peter Watson, NOAH chairman of technical affairs and registration and development manager with drug company Bayer, said it was known that:

'two days after you wean the pigs they will develop diarrhoea, and some will become very ill. You include a therapeutic drug over that period to prevent that happening and that is what we understand as prophylaxis” (1998, Evidence, p.208).

The main use of antimicrobials against streptococci in farm animals is for the treatment and control of S. suis (causes meningitis) infection in pigs. Most isolates of S. suis are extremely sensitive to penicillin but resistance has been identified. Treatment is by using penicillin in feed or water. Recently, amoxycillin or amoxyclav have taken over this role (67).

Mycloplasma treatment is particularly frequent in the pig (M. hypneumoniae) and is the reason for the use of significant amounts of antimicrobial (MAFF, 1998). Mycoplasma is an infective agent distinct from bacteria and viruses. The products used eg: tetracyclines, tylosin, tiamulin, lincomycin. Resistance has been identified to all these microbials (MAFF, 1998).

Copper sulphate is often added to the diet which increases growth rate (EU Directives limit the inclusion to 175 ppm for pigs up to 17 weeks, 100ppm for 17 weeks to 6 months, and 35ppm for pigs over 6 mths and breeding stock). Nitrovin is another non-antibiotic growth promoter which is used in the feed (but not with antibiotics). All substances have withdrawal periods before slaughter to avoid residues in the carcass. Although it is admitted that:

"Drug safety is checked by licensing authorities but there is room for misuse, abuse or carelessness of use". (1)

The Pig Industry Crisis

Despite £30 billion being poured into European agriculture every year, the industry is in crisis - not least pig farming. Farming accounts for less than 2% of the EU's output (GDP) and yet it attracts this incredible subsidy. Without it, red meat would be so expensive that consumption would collapse; even with it, the industry is staggering. This monumental sum is topped up even further by our Government with special payments to 'needy' cases.

In September 1998 the Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) also joined in and gave an additional £3million to the battered pig industry to help it market its products and stave off collapse. By February 1999, Farming News announced that despite this, the market for pig meat had again collapsed to an all time low. According to the MLC, losses for the nine months to January 1999 topped £150 million.

Why the crisis?

Farmers are not short of reasons. They blame a strong pound, which cuts the cost of imports and encourages retailers to buy foreign. Some say there's an oversupply of pig meat, which is driving down prices. Others claim UK farmers face increased costs for getting rid of sow stalls, because of the banning of bonemeal in pig feed and for joining quality assurance schemes.

Supermarket chains, however, deny they're buying more from abroad. Eg Tesco is claiming that all their fresh pork is British as is 60 per cent of their own brand bacon. Marks & Spencer say they sell only UK fresh pork and sausages and refuse to buy any meat from animals kept in stalls and tethers, wherever it comes from.

The whining of UK farmers has got up the nose of Europe and its producers are hitting back. The Danish Bacon & Meat Council claims it has also been a victim of low prices and faces costs not incurred by UK producers. They cite £8 million a year to control salmonella, increased costs following a ban on antibiotic growth promoters in `finishing' pigs and the cost of dealing with slurry. (17)

The constant cry of UK pig farmers is, of course, that they have the `best welfare standards in the world' and this is costing them dear. They're now attempting to save their bacon by launching consumer campaigns with the message that pigs are in paradise on Britain's factory farms.

In 2000, the Meat & Livestock Commission and the Government jointly funded a £4.6 million ad campaign to promote British pig meat. Almost every daily newspaper in the country carried the ads, urging consumers to buy British pork with the slogan ‘Look after the farmers who look after their pigs’.

Three out of four of the ads were judged misleading by the Advertising Standards Authority (ASA), following a complaint by Viva!.

Viva! stated that both pictures and copy presented a misleading picture of pig production in Britain’s pig farms. The ASA upheld our complaint saying: “... the three challenged advertisements misleadingly implied that pigs reared under the scheme led a more free life than they did”. The MLC was asked to withdraw them and to take greater care not to mislead in future.

The ASA found that consumers reading the ads would be unaware that most pigs were not kept outdoors, that most pigs are intensively farmed and that, despite the ads’ claims of good living conditions, they could consider the size of pig stalls to be ‘tiny’.

It is particularly distasteful that the government used taxpayer’s money to fund ads that deliberately set out to deceive the public.

It is almost impossible to understand how livestock farming (not market gardening, however) has managed to secure such preferential treatment when it is so damaging - to health, the environment and animals. Whole industries have been devastated in the name of axing subsidies, particularly mining, steel and ship building - but not livestock farming and the intensively grown fodder.

We all should be aware that this industry has powerful and influential supporters who will fight to the bitter end to preserve their right to untold amounts of public money. Even at the mention of reform, French farmers descend on Paris and cause havoc.

Even victories have to be treated with caution. The announcement that 7 antibiotics have been withdrawn from farm use has a double edge. It may mean that remaining antibiotics will be used more liberally. Viva! argues that instead we must alter the conditions so that this appalling chemical cocktail is no longer required.

The crisis facing animal farming is not short term but a sign of increasing problems. Viva!’s answer is to end intensive farming and to encourage the public to stop eating animals. And what's the industry’s answer? Paul Blanchard, manager of the Meat and Livestock Commission's Stotfold Pig Development Unit has no doubt. The pig industry must:

"optimise genetic potential from our stock at the lowest cost of production possible". He continues:

"The UK industry is, on average, achieving only two thirds of the genetic potential of pigs. Exploiting more of this potential is a challenge we must meet to survive in business."

In other words the industry wants to continue down the road of industrialisation; manipulating animals to make them grow larger, with low fat, in the shortest possible time.

Genetic engineering - the industry’s answer

Pig Farming magazine states the health of the future industry lies in ‘welfare, marketing, the genetic revolution and the need to lower costs and increase efficiency.’

In Pig Farming, April 1999, John Webb, geneticist at Cotswold Pig Development Company is sure that genetic engineering will shape the future of the pig industry. He states that the ‘genetic revolution’ has brought frozen embryos, allowing scientists to move genes around without risk, cloning, sex determination, in-vitro meiosis, selecting and cloning embryos.

He says: “Technology also provides the key to insert genes that would help improve pig meat quality, cause faster growth and ensure healthier pigs”. He states that using a Meishan sow, scientists could add a growth development factor to increase litter size, a gene to provide a better carcase, a gene to determine sex to ‘ensure more efficient males and eliminate boar taint by removing genes responsible for skatole and andriosterone”, so producing “36 top quality piglets per sow per year”.

“That modern pig could then be cloned to provide producers with a regular income”. (9)

Pig Meat Standard Schemes

More than 95% of pigs kept for meat and 70% of breeding sows are factory farmed. And yet much vaunted assurance schemes have been developed to entice the consumer to buy British reared pig meat. The certification marks are supposed to guarantee higher welfare, hygiene etc. standards. Do they? Or are consumers being conned?

RSPCA Freedom Foods

The word ‘Freedom’ in Freedom Foods does not guarantee that the meat came from animals that were free range. In fact, much of the pig meat approved by the RSPCA comes from animals kept in indoor intensive systems.

This, not surprisingly, comes as a shock to those consumers who trust the RSPCA to only approve of non-intensive production. In fact the RSPCA’s standards are almost identical to those of the meat industry - FABPigs/Meat and Livestock Commission/MAFF ie those who support factory farming. As the RSPCA Freedom Food does not offer markedly higher standards of welfare than the industry’s own schemes, the question must be - why have the RSPCA launched Freedom Food at all?

Viva!’s position is that the word ‘Freedom’ should not be used at all in the RSPCA’s trade mark for food as it misleads the public into believing the animals killed for the products were free range, or at least from less intensive conditions than which this welfare charity approves.

Further, the RSPCA has not improved conditions for pigs in general at all. Instead the Freedom Food scheme approves of the status quo, with standards being no better than those proposed by the NFU, MLC or MAFF! Viva! believes the public and the animals deserve better.

Some examples of the RSPCA standards from their document RSPCA Welfare Standards for Pigs; Freedom Food (43) illustrate the point:

RSPCA: ‘Piglets must not be weaned from the sow before 3 weeks of age.’

Viva! comment: The scheme approves farms which wean at 3 weeks. Naturally piglets would be weaned at 12 weeks and parting them from their mother this early makes them extremely vulnerable to disease; leads to overuse of antibiotics and other medicines; and causes trauma to both mother and piglets. Presumably the RSPCA chose 3 weeks because this is when most intensive systems currently wean piglets (so that they can make the sow pregnant again as soon as possible in order to produce more piglets from her.)

The RSPCA even admit that ‘The earlier the weaning age...the greater the chance of them suffering from welfare problems,’ but rather than stipulating that farmers must wean later, they say: ‘therefore a more careful system is required with respect to management...’

RSPCA: on lying areas for pigs... ‘It must be a sufficient size to accommodate all pigs together lying on their sides.’

Viva! comment: The RSPCA approves of farms that give sufficient space to allow pigs to lie down at the same time and no more...barely overcrowded at all!

RSPCA: on space allowances... ‘Pigs must always be provided with a total floor space no less than 1.5 times the lying area.’

The minimum bedded space for growing pigs is as follows:

Live weight (kg)

Lying area (m2)

Total area (m2)

10

0.10

0.15

100

0.50

0.75


Viva! comment: In our view this means that the RSPCA approves of overcrowded (not illegal) conditions. In essence, pigs have enough space to lie down and a fraction more for their life. It recommends that an adult sow should be given at least 3.5m2. These standards are the same as the industry’s and are the minimum requirements by law! You couldn’t get further from ‘freedom’ for these animals.

RSPCA: ‘The pig must be free to turn around without difficulty at all times. The dimension of any stall or pen must be such that the internal area is not less than the square of the length of the pig and no internal size is less than 75% of the length of the pig.’

Viva! comment: These requirements are the minimum standards required by MAFF and are the same as those for the industry’s FabPigs scheme for dry sows (breeding females who are not suckling). So the pig must be kept in an area which is at least as big as the pig’s length on all sides. This space is the equivalent of giving a 5’ 10’’ man a room measuring 5’10’’ on all sides. Not welfare friendly and certainly not what ‘freedom’ conjures up.

RSPCA: ‘The use of farrowing crates is contrary to the principles of Freedom Food Standards’ however they allow them anyway. ‘Sows must not be kept in farrowing crates for more than 28 days after farrowing.’ (1998 standards)

In the revised Freedom Food standards (June 2000) the RSPCA allow existing scheme members to continue using the farrowing crate until 2005, new applicants must give mother sows the freedom to turn around when her piglets are five days old.

Viva! comment: The RSPCA are deeply compromised. As an animal welfare organisation the meat industry's commercial considerations should not be what drives their standards. However, this is exactly what has happened. In an effort to work with intensive producers, the RSPCA have sacrificed pigs’ welfare.

Any member of the public who cares about the way farm animals are treated would be disgusted to discover that the RSPCA ever approved of farrowing crates in its Freedom Foods scheme. It is a welcome move that they are being phased out - perhaps Viva!’s pressure on the RSPCA helped bring about this change? Finally, it is disappointing that the RSPCA will allow sows about to give birth to be crated. This is an active time for the sow when she would naturally walk for miles and build a nest. Crating her is extremely cruel.

RSPCA: ‘Tail docking is against the principles of Freedom Food standards. However, at the present time it is accepted that it may be necessary, to alleviate pain and suffering caused by tail biting. As soon as enough information is available regarding husbandry methods which prevent tail biting outbreaks, the practice of tail docking for preventative reasons will not be permitted within the Freedom Food scheme.’

Viva! comment: Again the RSPCA compromises welfare principles in order to support a common intensive farming practice. It is misleading to state that not enough information is available on how to stop tail biting. Detailed and numerous studies have shown that tail biting is caused by bad management eg overcrowding, no straw and early weaning. (See Factory farming causes tail biting section.)

The RSPCA, instead of allowing cruel procedures that are against their principles, should set much higher welfare standards which would eliminate tail-biting and therefore the ‘need’ to tail dock.

The RSPCA also approves of units which never allow a pig to see or feel sunlight; to be able to run and play; to explore the natural world. They permit teeth clipping, a transport time up to 8 hours; and of withdrawing food for up to 18 hours before slaughter.

The British Meat Quality Standard Mark

The British Meat Quality Standard Mark for pigmeat was launched in January 1999 - backed by the government’s agriculture minister Nick Brown. The BPISG chairman Stewart Houston said:

“The new Mark recognises the vital importance of identifying British pigmeat and differentiates the superior British specification from most imported pigmeat.”

The Mark was introduced by the Meat and Livestock Commission (MLC) whose remit it is to promote red meat. By 2000 they had spent £2.5 million on a campaign promoting the Mark to retailers and consumers that pigmeat products with this badge have reached ‘high welfare standards, production, processing and transport.’

Jim Macaulay, chairman of the MLC’s Pork and Bacon Promotion Council said:

“We are confident it will deliver what the consumer wants across key issues of food safety, quality assurance and animal welfare.”

Pigmeat sold using the Quality Standard logo must be produced from UK pig farms approved by either FAB(Farm Assured British)Pigs, the Malton code or Scottish Pig Industry Initiative quality assurance scheme.

The Farm Assured British Pigs Scheme (FABPigs)

FABPigs launched in September 1996. “Coverage of the scheme has reached around 70% of the kill. Alongside farm membership, abattoir membership of the British Quality Assured Pork is rising rapidly and most British abattoirs require FABPigs membership of their suppliers” said Rob Gready, Scheme Manager (21).

FABPigs is owned by the National Farmers Union; The British Pig Association; Federation of Fresh Meat wholesalers and British Meat and Manufacturers Association.

The only pigs shown in a photo in the main promotional leaflet is that of, surprise surprise, free range animals! However, as with the RSPCA and other industry schemes it mainly approves indoor intensive units

Some examples of FABPigs standards (from Products Certification Scheme for Farm Assured British Pigs) are:

Tooth clipping of newly born piglets is acceptable.

Tail docking is allowed (but must be reviewed by farmer and vet quarterly and a vet must be present and it must be done to piglets less than 48 hrs old)

FABPigs base their space requirements for intensively produced pigs on that of the minimum requirements demanded by law (Welfare of Livestock Regulations (1994)) - in other words, as with the RSPCA, the scheme does not guarantee high welfare. It guarantees implementing a weak, ineffective law which states that pigs should have space to turn around; lie down at the same time and have a dry lying area. And - as with the RSPCA - that’s more or less it!

Precisely:

A growing (fattening pig) requires the minimum of:

Live weight (kg)

Total area (m2)

10

0.15

85-110

0.65



A breeding sow or gilt should have a minimum of 1.5m2.

And for dry sows (non-suckling breeding females): ‘The dimension of any stall or pen must be such that the internal area is not less than the square of the length of the pig and no internal side is less than 75% of the length of the pig.’

So the human equivalent of a growing pig - keeping a 10 stone human in an area of less than 0.5m2.

And for farrowing pigs:

Farrowing crates are permitted for 28 days after giving birth and piglets may be weaned at 3 weeks.

Bedding

No mention is made of provision of bedding materials for indoor pigs (yet outdoor pigs must be well bedded).

Enriched environment

No mention is made of having to provide pigs with straw (or any other material) to allow for expression of natural behaviour such as rooting, chewing and so on.

In summary the RSPCA, FABpigs and MLC’s British Meat Quality Standard schemes are very similar and state the following ;

Withdraw drugs before slaughter in accordance with the law

Treat sick animals

Monitor disease

Provide separate pens for ill and injured animals

Monitor tail, ear, flank biting and fighting and produce an action plan to stop it

Dispose of casualty pig carcases promptly through a registered outlet or by burying or burning on farm

Clean the establishment

Train personnel

Keep pigs in stable groups

Mark pigs for ID

Inspect growing pigs once a day

Allow tooth clipping and tail docking within 48 hours of birth

Allow nose ringing (not the RSPCA)

Provide flooring which is washable and does not cause injury

Provide artificial light to indoor pigs for equivalent of daylight hours

Provide space for the pigs to turn around and lie down at the same time (but no more is necessary)

Keep breeding boars (huge animals) in pens of at least 10m2 for their life

Keep breeding sows in a space which is not less than their square length (so they can just turn around)

Allow farrowing crates for 28 days after birth (RSPCA phasing to 5 days)

Allow weaning at 3 weeks (naturally would be 12)

Provide food each day on a ‘wholesome’ diet

Provide fresh water each day

Transport time up to 8 hours


Unfortunately, the British Meat Quality Standard Mark was awarded to at least one of the farms that Viva! filmed. The establishment was anything but clean and pigs were covered in faeces, had no bedding and some were in permanent darkness.

The Malton Code

The Malton Code is approved by the MLC’s British Meat Quality Standard scheme. It is a code produced by Malton Foods, part of Unigate plc, a food manufacturing group operating in the UK and Continental Europe. Malton Foods describes itself as a "complete pigmeat processing business producing a wide range of added-value pork, bacon and ham products and other cooked meats." It slaughters pigs, turns them into bacon and so on and packages. Malton Foods is one of the largest pigmeat producers in Britain and therefore developed its own code for its 2000 suppliers.

Again, the Code bases itself on the FAWCs Five Freedoms and MAFF's Code of recommendation for welfare of Livestock - Pigs.

Tail docking is permitted within 24 hours of birth, no vet has to be present. Tooth clipping is permitted also within 24 hrs of birth.

No sharp wedges must be pig’s pens

Slatted floors are allowed. Flooring must be well drained with dry bedding and a dry lying area at all times.

Stock must not be kept in darkness and have light for 8 hrs min per day at 50 lux.

Sick pigs to be separated in hospital pens

In transport/moving, goads, sticks and pipes not allowed.

Slurry and waste to be disposed of so as not to be a health or pest hazard

Carcases must be disposed of promptly and not available to 'vermin, wild birds or domestic animals'.

Space

Malton follows MAFF and so requires the same as FABPigs i.e.:

A growing (fattening pig) requites the minimum of:

Live weight (kg)

Total area (m2)

10

0.15

85-110

0.65



And, as with the RSPCA and FABPigs, dry sows are allowed 1.5sq.m. to lie in

Farrowing crates are permitted - not to keep sows in more than 7 days before birth and 28 days after, unless weaned late and then 35 days. Piglets to have source of heat and dry lying area pre-weaning.

Boars can be kept isolated in a space of 6 sq.m. for their whole life.

Adequate water to be available

Effective ventilation and no draughts

Keep temperature comfortable

Fed daily and trough space in restrict feed systems must allow pigs to feed at same time

Swill may not be fed. But industrial food waste (non-meat) may be used

Feed storage tidy and clean.

Growth promoting antibiotics allowed, except in sow feed.

Environmental enrichment is none mandatory and no ideas are given.

Can be kept without food up to 18 hrs before slaughter, journey time up to 8 hrs

Analyse all the above schemes and it is soon apparent that they basically state standards which allow pigs to live and grow to be killed as quickly as possible in the smallest space possible with very little or no provision made for the basics which make life worth living. They are in close confinement their whole lives and can’t exercise or express normal behaviour. These animals have active, inquisitive and intelligent minds and yet they are given nothing. Even the mothers have their piglets taken from them at 3 weeks, only to be made pregnant five days later until she is killed for ‘low grade’ meat.

The only organisation to set markedly higher standards for animal welfare is the Soil Association.

The Soil Association Standards for Organic Food and Farming

The scheme does not guarantee that pigs are free range, although it actively encourages outdoor farming. For indoor pigs this is the only scheme which states that for both breeding and fattening pigs there must be:

‘Ample dry bedding with plentiful natural ventilation and light’ and:

‘Access to an outside run with a dunging, rooting and exercise area, and a rubbing post and implements for play.’

It is also the only scheme which completely prohibits the use of farrowing crates and the weaning of piglets at under six weeks (the RSPCA allows weaning at three weeks).

The Soil Association also prohibits:

Antibiotics, copper diet supplements and probiotics for growth promotion and:

Tail docking

Routine teeth cutting

Castration

The prophylactic use of iron injections

The purchase of animals from livestock markets

The purchase of stock that have been produced using transgenic or other genetic engineering techniques


Click Here for Previous Section ~ Click Here for Next Section

 

 
Campaigns
Video

Contents:

The Size and Type of Pig Industry in Britain

About Pigs

A Typical British Pig Farm

Pigs Kept for Breeding

Mutilations

Nutrition and Feeding

Disease

Drugs

The Pig Industry Crisis

Pig Meat Standard Schemes


Glossary

References


Appendix 1 - The Inaction of Maff

Appendix 2 - The Law

Appendix 3 - Meat and Breeds

Appendix 4 - Description of Viva!'s footage of 18 pig farms



Viva! is a registered charity 1037486

PRIVACY POLICY

Viva!, 8 York Court, Wilder Street, Bristol BS2 8QH, UK
T: 0117 944 1000 F: 0117 924 4646 E: info@viva.org.uk