Under Fire
A Viva! Report on The Killing of Kangaroos for Meat and Skin
by Juliet Gellatley BSc (Zoology), Director of Viva!

 

Kangaroo Farming

So serious are the problems of land degradation that the federal Government announced that the 1990s is the 'decade of landcare' - what a miserable failure that has been! The kangaroo industry has taken advantage of the increasing public concern over land destruction, arguing that soft footed kangaroos do not destroy the sensitive landscape and so kangaroo farming should replace sheep and cattle.

(This has caused disagreement amongst farmers as many will not publicly admit the damage they have done to the environment and others believe kangaroo farming to be unviable.)

This 'farm the wildlife' argument is appealing to some who would like to see introduced species removed from the arid and semi-arid zones. Even some 'conservationists', usually concerned about wildlife exploitation are prepared to sacrifice the wild status of kangaroos in the belief that it is a better option than continued land destruction.

But kangaroo farming is not the answer to protecting the environment.

All it will lead to is the kangaroo industry shooting yet more wildlife and ecosystems being further destroyed. Valuing animals in purely economic terms ignores their intrinsic worth. It ignores their individuality and right to well being. It also ignores their ecological worth. It is this attitude that has led to one-third of the world's animal genetic resources now being at risk.

Other species, when used as 'renewable resources', have declined or become extinct. Even the fishing industry, with all its management programmes, quotas and massive subsidies - and knowledge of the damage it is causing by over exploitation, has still reached crisis point, with half of the world's main fishing grounds facing environmental collapse (12). Think of any wild animal which has had a price tag put on its head - cheetahs, whales, tigers, gorillas, chimpanzees, rhinos, seals, exotic birds, Toolache Wallaby (extinct) and the danger signs for the future of the kangaroo become clear.

The challenge is to save and preserve our remaining wildlife - not to farm it or blast it off the face of the planet.

Kangaroo Farming is not commercially viable

Apart from the ecological and ethical debates, livestock farmers will not give up sheep and cattle in favour of kangaroos because it is not commercially viable.

As stated by the National Kangaroo Campaign (6), female kangaroos first breed in their second or third year, after which they produce a maximum of one offspring per year. Often mortality of pouch young is very high and drought may stop kangaroos breeding altogether. (Nature has worked out how to control populations, without the intervention of humans, over millions of years). A young kangaroo is dependent on its mother until it is at least 14 months old and so cannot be sold as live young.

Compare this rate of reproduction with sheep. Sheep, unlike kangaroos can produce twins. Lambs are independent of the mother within a few months and can be sold live. Sheep first breed after
one year.

Kangaroos only produce two commercial products, meat and skin. Both are one-offs and require the animal to be killed. Sheep on the other hand are productive throughout their lives, producing at
least one wool clip a year and meat and skin when they are slaughtered. Furthermore, whereas lambs produce 20kg of meat at 3 - 6 months old, kangaroos produce much less meat and are too small to kill before 18 months old. Only about 10% of a kangaroo is useable for meat - a large red kangaroo of 60kg will only result in 6kg of prime cut meat. The rest will only be sold for pet meat or meat and bone meal.

In John Cameron's Recovering Ground, he concludes that the kangaroo industry could only ever provide 0.5% of Australia's current meat production (13).

Furthermore, anyone trying to care for kangaroos will testify to the difficulties involved. Kangaroos suffer from e.g. post-capture myopathy, lumpy jaw (a fatal and highly contagious disease which is very hard to treat, meaning once contaminated an area must be free of kangaroos for at least three years), Coccidiosis and much more.

Post-capture myopathy is common and affects kangaroos after a chase or handling. Kangaroos suffer greatly from stress and an adrenalin rush can quickly kill the animal or may cause deterioration of muscles and a slower death.

The inability of kangaroos to be herded, yarded, or easily handled makes veterinary treatment and inspections difficult. It also makes farming the animal very risky.

Diseases in Kangaroos

As stated recently by agricultural scientists: "The recent series of diseases and mass mortalities in wild fauna, and emerging disease of wildlife in Australia have demonstrated the importance of wildlife disease as threats to biodiversity, human health, agriculture and trade." (36)

It is possible that the weakened genetic pool due to continually shooting the healthiest, strongest animals is responsible for increased disease levels in kangaroos. Some examples include:

In October 1998 there was a major epidemic of an unknown disease in northwestern New South Wales. The epidemic had a sudden onset, a short duration of about two weeks and high death rate. (37) Most animals were found dead, some had difficulty rising and moved awkwardly. More mature kangaroos were affected than young. The epidemic had drastic effects on the population. Between 1998 and 1999 in the five affected areas, there was a 42% decline in red kangaroos and a 46% decline in greys. In the main affected area, there was a startling 72% reduction in red kangaroos. (This did not lead to a reduction in the quota for New South Wales for the number shot for meat.) Similar types of epidemics have also occurred in Queensland in 1990 and 1999.

A widespread outbreak of blindness occurred in many thousands of kangaroos between April and July 1994, and between March and June 1995, in western New South Wales, Southern Australia, north western Victoria and later, in December 1995 to April 1996 in Western Australia. Western greys were mainly affected but also eastern greys, reds and euros succumbed - all species that are commercially killed for meat. (38, 39) It is believed that the outbreaks were caused by a virus (possibly the Wallal virus) spread by insects but the factors leading to the epidemic are unknown (38).

Parasites in Kangaroo Meat

Agricultural scientists identify a complete lack of "preparedness" to cope with wildlife diseases in Australia (36). Indeed the Federal Minister for Agriculture, Warren Truss, issued a press release on
12 April 2001 stating that kangaroo meat does not represent any health risks! However he has still not backed up this statement with evidence.

Kangaroos harbour a vast range of parasites - many increase with stress and crowding.

Speare et al (14) neatly sums up the problem:

"Both species of Grey kangaroos may be infected with 30,000 nematodes from 20 different species...

"A forceful advertising campaign will be required to convince the consumer of the unique health benefits of Pelecitus Roemeri (large nematode worm which in southern Queensland infects 18% of M. gigantus, 6% of M. rufus and 22% of M. robustus...)".

Dr David Obendorf, Wildlife Veterinary Pathologist, Australian Member of the Scientific Advisory Board to the International Animal Health Body, Paris (Office des Internationale epizootes), with 20 years experience in the parasites and diseases of Australian fauna says:

"Kangaroos and wallabies can harbour a wide range of parasitic bacterial, fungal and viral diseases and most of the infections are inapparent (i.e. the animal looks normal). Even meat inspection procedures are unlikely to detect some infections unless gross lesions are apparent or samples are taken for testing.

"Worldwide, it is well recognised that so-called game meats are a source of infections for consumers, especially when care is not taken while eviscerating and handling the carcasses or when the meat is served undercooked or raw.

"In the last 25 years or so, of 35 new or newly recognised infections in humans, 20 (57%) have been zoonotic in origin - some trivial, some devastating to both the individual and the community.

"In Australia, Toxoplasmosis and Salmonellosis are two infections with public health significance directly related to the handling, processing and consumption of kangaroo meat. A recent food-borne outbreak of Toxoplasmosis caused acute clinical illnesses in 12 humans and one case of congenital chorio-retinitis (inflammation of the eye tissue) in a new born baby. The mother of the baby with the other 12 people had attended a function at which rare kangaroo medallions were served. A thorough epidemiological examination concluded that the most likely risk food was the kangaroo meat."

Toxoplasmosis is caused by a protozoan parasite; symptoms include fever, headache, weakness, muscle pains and liver dysfunction lasting 1 to 4 weeks. The cysts are killed by thorough cooking, but survive in rare cooked meats. As kangaroo meat is often undercooked, chances of infection are greater.

A recent scientific report from the International Health Organisation warns that wild animal meats which are raw, undercooked, dried or cold-smoked are potentially infectious to animal or humans that eat them.

Dr Obendorf states: "The concern is that chefs recommend cooking methods which would not kill this {Toxoplasma} parasite." (22)

He continues: "I know of no comprehensive or recent serological or direct parasitic survey of kangaroos for Toxoplasma prevalence. It would seem very necessary that Australian authorities can reassure 'roo meat consumers about the safety of this product. Toxoplasma is one defined public health risk associated with game meat from Australia. In addition there is no data available to assess whether these free-ranging pseudo-ruminants (i.e.macropod marsupials) are likely to have any transmissible spongiform encephalopathy conditions.

"In the case of Toxoplasma, the 'absence of evidence' of disease freedom, - in itself is concerning, as importing WTO member countries should be requiring the 'evidence of absence' before permitting this meat to be made freely available or stipulating that (1) meat undergoes processing measures to kill this organism through freezing for a defined period of time and/or (2) labelling the meat with a warning and providing precise cooking instructions to customers. This should be a basic requirement for minimizing the food-borne risk against Toxoplasma infection." (35)

Australian doctors in 1997 warned of a new threat to human health from eating kangaroo meat. Two victims have been identified and one, a Tasmanian man, suffered a mysterious illness for many years before eventually being placed on a ventilator. He was unable to stand and was losing his power of speech before the parasite was detected. (The nematode worm inhabits muscle cells making it very difficult to detect.)

Dr Erika Cox, clinical microbiologist at Launceston General Hospital, said: "Laboratory tests suggest a new species of microscopic worm is responsible." She added: "People who eat kangaroos and wallabies are at risk of all kinds of parasites that are not normally studied because they don't occur in livestock."

Professor John Goldsmid, medical microbiologist at the University of Tasmania, claims that the cases illustrate how little is known about the potential for 'native' animals to infect humans. He also questions the safety of exporting 'native' meats from Australia to countries such as the UK and maintains that further research is needed. He stressed that the trend to undercook kangaroo involved "probable dangers". (15)

Dr Obendorf says: "Australia has no dedicated research or diagnostic facility to investigate wildlife diseases. Detections of new diseases are handled on an ad hoc basis by government or university laboratories".

Some states of Australia rejected kangaroo meat for many years because of lack of hygiene and control in the killing of these animals. In fact in most states it only became legal to sell kangaroo meat for human consumption in 1993!

One in two kangaroos may harbour Salmonella (16). Killing in the outback and the time delay between processing and cool storing is obviously a problem for bacterial contamination. Shooters are supposed to carry out pre-death inspections - monitoring the movement of an animal to determine if there is any apparent indication of sickness. Shooting animals at night requires them to be static, transfixed by the spotlight so any such inspections are impossible. If the animal is ill and the meat becomes fervered after death, the dark colouring of kangaroo meat ensures there are few visual indications of the condition.

Because of the many external and internal parasites, kangaroos killed between sunset and sunrise are supposed to be placed under refrigeration within two hours of sunrise. Shooters often travel long distances for their night's kill and in summer there are few hours of darkness. Again there is no monitoring of this regulation and no supervision that can reject meat delayed through mechanical breakdown or from vehicles which have become bogged down. The whole process of regulation is worthless.

As Wally Curran, Secretary of the Australian Meat Industries Employees Union stated:

"The only thing game about kangaroo meat is that you would need to be game to eat it."

The Future: Tourism?

It is tragic that some people need to put a commercial value on wildlife. They have no true appreciation or understanding of the natural world and are intent on destroying it. They feel the world belongs to them; that they have the right to kill other species because it gives them pleasure, a rush of power and money - or because of sheer ignorance. Any pretence that killing kangaroos is to "prevent extinction" or to "control pests" is simply an attempt to gain public and media acceptance. However, the kangaroo industry is not a benign force - it is destructive, cruel and brutal and responsible for the worst land wildlife massacre this planet has seen.

It is ironic that if you do accept that wildlife can be valued monetarily, then kangaroos are worth more alive than dead. Stafford Smith (1994) has shown that the value of mining and tourism in the Australian rangelands far outstrips pastoralism and the relatively paltry income from killing kangaroos. Dr David Croft, School of Biological Science, UNSW, says: "International nature-based tourism had a value to Australia of $6.6 billion in 1995. More than half this expenditure was in national parks". Despite the almost complete lack of promotion of a great wildlife experience in the Australian outback, tourists spent $343 million in 1995 on outback safaris (the kangaroo industry is worth $200 million in 2001 - less if you take into account subsidies). Croft says: "many an outback tourist will lament that of the few kangaroos they saw, the majority were roadkills." (43)

Dr Croft compares the poor promotion and development of wildlife safaris in Australia with the excellent profile of South Africa. He contrasts Sturt National Park, western New South Wales with the Kalahari-Gemsbok Park in S Africa/Botswana. The climate and landscape of both parks are similar with low rainfall, hot summers, ephemeral rivers, dune fields, pans and stony plains. (43)

Croft maintains that poor marketing and development of wildlife tourism in Australia means that while the Kalahari-Gemsbok Park enjoys 48,000 visitors with large annual growth since the release of Nelson Mandela and changes in the political system, Sturt National Park has 12,000 visitors. Croft argues that dingoes should be reintroduced to Sturt to help restore biodiversity and provide the drama of predation, and that the variety of mammals (especially kangaroos), reptiles (46 species) and birds (150 species) would attract many more visitors if managed correctly. He says: "We should emphasise our assets. Kangaroos have a body form unlike any other mammal. A European or American visiting Africa sees antelopes which share the same form as familiar deer, sheep and goats. In contrast, the hopping locomotion, the bipedal stance endowing the kangaroo with human-like behaviour and the joey in the pouch will leave international visitors entranced." (43)

Croft lists the benefits of such a strategy where wildlife is admired and respected, rather than blasted to bits. They include countering the extensive criticism worldwide for needlessly killing wildlife; recognising the intrinsic worth of kangaroos and Australia's exceptional wildlife heritage before it is too late; sustaining large populations of kangaroos as desirable and valuable; adding to the economic value of tourism; restoring biodiversity and expansion of protected areas; generating economic activity in rural communities.

Croft says: "Australia is perhaps the only country which is capable of maintaining large protected and wilderness areas without strong human population pressures on their boundaries. We cannot lecture other nations about maintenance of habitat and biodiversity if we, with the best possible circumstances, cannot get it right. It is time to show leadership and innovation on the world stage." (43)

Viva! concludes

Throughout human history, massacres of animals have taken place for pleasure or monetary gain. Each and every one of them, from the harpooning of whales to the shooting of passenger pigeons, the near annihilation of Africa's wildlife to the hunting of otters, foxes and deer, has been justified, excused and encouraged by those with a personal interest in the killing. Their arguments have, without exception, been proved wrong.

Human treatment of the wildlife of this globe and the habitats essential for its survival is a calamity. Those responsible appear to have learned nothing from history and continue to offer the same insupportable excuses for short-term commercial advantage. The fate of the world's wildlife is increasingly being determined by politicians and shop keepers who exclude morality from their decision making.

Viva! has stopped 1500 supermarket stores from selling kangaroo flesh nationwide. We believe that the British public does not want the world's wildlife to be massacred for meat or skin. However other countries are importing the flesh and skin of these beautiful creatures. If this trade becomes further established, no wild animal will be safe. It is time for those with vision and compassion to work within Australia and in the countries that import kangaroo meat and skin on a concerted consumer campaign to stop the trade for good. Viva! will play its part, you can too!

Back to Previous Section ~ Onto Next Section

 

 

 
Contents:

Introduction

The Export Trade in Kangaroo Meat and Skin

Viva! Ends the UK Trade

Kangaroo Products and Value

Tax Payers Fund the Kangaroo Killing

Which Kangaroos are Killed Commercially?

The Law Governing the Kill

How many Kangaroos are Killed?

Cruelty to Kangaroos

Joeys

Enforcing the Code

Under Fire

Why Are Kangaroos Killed?

Population Matters

Survival of the Unfittest

Further Contradictions of the Kangaroo Industry

Quotas - a Cynical PR Exercise

Kangaroos are Killed for Money, not Love...

Kangaroos and the Environment

Kangaroo - the Scapegoat for Land Mismanagement

Kangaroo Farming

Kangaroo Farming is Not Commercially Viable

Diseases in Kangaroos

Parasites in Kangaroo Meat

The Future: Tourism?

Viva! Concludes

Statements in support of Viva! from Australia

References

 


Viva! Vegetarians International Voice for Animals
8 York Court, Wilder Street, Bristol BS2 8QH, UK
T: 0117 944 1000 F: 0117 924 4646 E: info@viva.org.uk

Linktiger.com - Broken links finding service