CONTENTS

Part One
Introduction
Types of duck
Mallards
Muscovies
Beak trimming - a terrible mutilation
Viva! victory
Wire flooring
Water denied
Parent stock
Artificial insemination
Size of the UK industry
Duck meat – the low fat choice?
Duck egg industry
References (part one)

Part Two
Statistics
Down on the factory farm
Ducks out of water - the cruellest deprivation
Water supply - varying standards
Stocking densities
References (part two)

Part Three
The legal position
The Council of Europe’s Standing Committee of the European Convention for the Protection of Animals Kept for Farming Purposes Concerning Ducks, adopted June 1999
UK/EU law
1999/2000 welfare regulations
UK code of recommendations
References (part three)

Part Four
Breeding ducks
Amount of living space
Life expectancy
Litter management
Behavioural patterns
Food and drink
Sexual patterns
Preening
Parenting
References (part four)

Part Five
Duck exports
Varying farm standards
References (part five)

Part Six
Slaughter
Catching
Levels of suffering
Methods of killing
Dislocation
Sticking
Captive bolt
Electrical stunning
Gas stunning
Stunner failings
Religious slaughter of ducks
Instantaneous Mechanical Destruction: a hidden horror
Plucking
Dry plucking machine
Wax finishing
Wet plucking
References (part six)

Part Seven
Disease patterns
UK diseases
Starvation and injury
Antibiotics
Global diseases
Diseases of intensification
References (part seven)

Part Eight
Duck suppliers
Major supermarkets stocking duck meat
Manor Farm Ducklings
Producers of duck meat
Kerry Foods
Green Label
Cherry Valley
Telmara Farms Ltd
The rescued ducks
The Chinese sector - the overlooked trade in duck meat
Fat food
Mock duck - an alternative
References (part eight)

Part Nine
Global resources
References (part nine)

Part Ten
Viva!’s campaign – Ducks out of Water

Appendix 1

Part Nine

Global resources

'In the UK, 39 per cent of our wheat, 51 per cent of our barley, and 75 per cent of our total agricultural land is used to feed animals.' (1a)

'Worldwide, one-third of grain production is used for animal feed.' (1b)

The United Nations, the Worldwatch Institute (5) and even veterinarians writing for the European meat industry (6) have all recently issued extremely serious warnings about the impact of livestock production on the global environment and world food supplies. Of the six major environmental catastrophes identified by the UN, four are entirely due to the production of animal protein, while this factor plays a major part in the other two.

Against this background, Cherry Valley's boasts about its duck production are nothing more than myths - and dangerous ones at that.

The company says it is confident that the duck plays its part in combating world hunger: '...they can make a valuable contribution to alleviating the world's shortage of protein - the rapid growth of Cherry Valley ducklings can allow an annual output, given good husbandry and nutrition, approaching 100 kilograms of valuable protein per sqm of floor space...The duck can also play its part in helping to conserve the world's diminishing resources, for virtually everything from the feathers to the feet can be turned into profit. The liver, the tongue and even the feet all find a ready market, while the world demand for feathers is increasing so rapidly that the net return from this by-product is alone sufficient to pay the labour costs of a processing plant. So nothing about a Cherry Valley duckling is unsaleable - not even the quack.' (The World of Cherry Valley.)

Globally, and especially in third world countries, meat production has a negative effect on world hunger. Factory, or intensive, farming is the worst culprit since it encourages escalating meat consumption among those who can afford it at the expense of those who cannot - the poor. Furthermore, it provides minimal employment.

In most parts of the world, animal protein was traditionally eaten only in modest quantities. Since the discovery of antibiotics and the subsequent birth of factory farming and its relentless promotion by Western companies, the consumption of meat of all kinds has risen dramatically. Lester Brown, as President of the Worldwatch Institute, pointed out that two kilograms of additional grain are needed for each kilogram of poultry. He added that the growing trend towards a Western lifestyle is putting unbearable strains on China's natural resources (2).

The same argument applies across the world. It is only the more affluent who can afford meat products. The need to feed ever-increasing numbers of animals reduces the amount of life-sustaining grains and other plant proteins for direct human consumption while driving up the price. Alongside this, the problem of pollution gets ever worse.

Livestock production is a major contributor to most of the world's environmental problems, including acid rain. Ammonia gas from manure and slurry combine with oxides of sulphur and nitrogen in the atmosphere, produced by burning fossil fuels, to produce sulphuric and nitric acid. These acidify the ground or rivers and can dissolve out metals, particularly aluminium, from the soil, washing them into rivers where they poison fish. Meanwhile, plants are damaged by being deprived of the metal ions in the soil that they need for growth (3).

Water is consumed in unnatural quantities by intensively-kept animals, since temperatures in the units are often artificially high. Fodder grown on irrigated land also demands large quantities as do meat processing plants. Effluent from poultry farms and processing plants is frequently discharged into rivers, adding to the burden of pollution.

Factory farming methods promote disease in the stock, necessitating the reckless overuse of antibiotics to counteract disease. This in turn endangers public health, when harmful bacteria become resistant to life-saving drugs (4). Often meat from intensive farming methods is contaminated with pathogens that cause food poisoning in humans, for example salmonella, listeria, campylobacter and E. coli.

Cherry Valley's boast that every bit of the duck is used cannot disguise the fact that the intensive duck industry is no different from other similar industries, greedily using up food and water resources needed by human populations. Intensive duck farming causes serious levels of pollution, while forcing billions of living creatures into lives of man-made deprivation.

References (part nine)

    1. MAFF, Agriculture in the United Kingdom 1999 & 1998. HMSO, London
    2. Haan C. de, Steinfeld H. and Blackburn H., Livestock and the Environment, Finding a Balance, Annex 2 . A study coordinated by the Food and Agriculture organisation, the US Agency for International Development and the World Bank, European Commission, 1996. From Factory Farming & the Environment, A Report For Compassion in World Farming Trust (ISBN 1 900156 11 3 , October 1999)
  1. Brown, Lester. Who will Feed China? Worldwatch Environmental Alert Series p47
  2. Factory Farming & the Environment, A Report for Compassion in World Farming Trust (ISBN 1 900156 11 3, October 1999)
  3. FAWN/NSAFF The Drugs Don't Work, 1998
  4. Will we still eat meat? Article by Ed Ayres, editorial director World Watch Institute, Time magazine, Nov. 1999
  5. 6. Skjerve E., Ewald S., Skovgaard N., The European Meat Industry in the 1990’s, Meat Production and the Environment. Ecceamst 1991, Audet Tijdschriften B.V.

Viva! Vegetarians International Voice for Animals
8 York Court, Wilder Street, Bristol BS2 8QH, UK
T: 0117 944 1000 F: 0117 924 4646 E: info@viva.org.uk